So Key Leadership Success

"Leadership is action, not position." (Donald H. Mc Gannon)

MAY on the appropriate sentence to describe what is presented in the AMA article on Thursday, on February 19 on "Education System and its application." From the three examples given, the success of implementing the new system, all originate from the leadership. In the first instance, a kindergarten teacher to give guidance concerning toilet training is a direct action of the kindergarten children, so children would not want to follow what is delivered by teachers in kindergarten. In the case, the kindergarten teachers to use the authority and "Power" is to change the behavior of children. Second example is how the traffic separator string on the road, so that the flow of traffic on the line is slowly becoming more regularly. Action taken by people who certainly have the strong leadership of the soul. I do not know whether it is a position that has as Kasatlantas, Kapolres or Kapolsek, but the results of which appear, could not be denied that it is thanks to his leadership. Model examples of leadership in the leadership that is able to associate the individual with a view of the environment through their ability to "visioning."

An example is last on the improvement work in a maintenance department of a textile industry. There is successful conversion work system, so that efficiency can be achieved. This also is a leader's ability to implement the changes. In this case, in view of leadership as a stimulus factor menggerakan organizations to achieve success. Almost the same as the first example of a man who has the authority and "Power".

Apart from the perspective of where we see the leadership, which we clearly see that the leadership at various levels of organization is needed, especially when the organization wanted to change the system of work must ultimately change the way / workplace behavior.

Changing the behavior of relatively more difficult to appeal in the form of new employment. Changing the behavior that has long mengakar at once felt "comfortable", will make people accept that a new considered. While the system has been running so long is not good, so every organization that has a view of the future will be reviewing the system in effect at this time.

The meaning of the system in the organization

A system is in essence a mechanism which is able to improve the organization's activity cycle in full. This system will function effectively, if based a standard that has been accepted by all member organizations, and supported with a clear guidance with no exceptions.

With a clear, an organization may be possible to evaluate the achievements of individuals or groups based on the standards that have been defined, as a basis for the provision of incentives, and as a means of monitoring / management control. A system is in fact a channel for the organization to translate the ideas in the form of concrete action or activity a day-to-day.

To assess the strength of a productive company, we generally focus more on the financial position, technical capabilities and the strength of human resources and the views of the company's cash flow. Quality product priority, ditopang by managerial capabilities, innovation ability, control of the market share of the company and so forth. In addition, we must also recognize how far up the operational system of the company. With the system to identify operational, we will understand the true strength of the company.

Almost all the operational issues can be solved by using a variety of ways. For example, the problem of lack of cash flow, can be overcome with the search for a loan, reducing the number of employees or to sell part of the property company. Problems can also be addressed by making certain innovations in order to increase productivity. Accelerate delivery, improve the billing process of trade receivables, or to improve the quality of products and services company.

All I need is just now breaking free. But there is a solution that does not spend additional meaning. This is often never realize or be a lot of people. Have you noticed that with a little refinement system operational, we can improve the efficiency of the various resources available, cook the product quality, speed and encourage the effectiveness of the activities or functional?

With perbaikian system, time and cost savings will be many. Operational disruption and chaos can be pressed. This must be a standard activity of the company periodically. For example, with the re-analyze the target company's long-term, re-assess the short-term goals, work plan, budget allocation, the performance of employees, users and the scale of the analysis of various aspects of the business. Adjustments are made consistent with the current changes in internal and external company. Here, it is clear that a system is a source of strength of the organization to monitor, improve and enhance the performance of employees.

The system is a resource that invaluable price. For that, each system must be used seoptimal possible. The system is a living organization and determines the efficiency, effectiveness is measured from the employees, or members of organizations utilizing the system.

To find out where the company has been using the system is working well, we can see all the company's system works or not. Until where harmony and integration of all the existing system? Are all the systems have been implemented fully utilized? Whether the system has been used can be used at other companies? Can we introduce a new system to enhance and improve the performance of the company?

Many companies that feel proud that they are working efficiently. This is evidenced by the low production cost, effective marketing, customer service and adequate. But the true measure of efficiency to which the company is able to utilize the system effectively. The fact is often separated from the attention of us all. Testing level operational efficiency is the speed and attitude in the company completed their routine activities.

So, in principle, system and procedures are developed, as a work behavior of members of the organization. Application must be supported by strong leadership. This means one or more persons who have authority, "power" and vision. Thus the members of the organization that will be difficult to be changed would not want to follow the system that has been formed.

This is already evident on the organization that will menerapakan a particular system. Perhaps from the top leaders have confidence that with the implementation of the system and new work procedures, so that ideally will materialize. In fact at the bottom more, the changes implemented this system is difficult, but often cause tension